1. "'President Obama said this week that his health care plan won't cover illegal immigrants, but argued that's all the more reason to legalize them and ensure they eventually do get coverage." http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/18/obama-ties-immigration-to-health-care-battle/?feat=home_cube_position1
2. "we seem to still rely on the creativity and competence of politicians to solve problems, which always somehow seem to be tied in with which lobby is the strongest in Washington." http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=218
3. Who is lobbying for amnesty? Large corporations who want the cheap labor subsidised by the American taxpayer. http://www.numbersusa.org/ (At that link you will find that the Chamber is one of the biggest lobbyists for Amnesty...you will find out about many other interesting things as well)
Illegals and H1 B visa workers (outsourced workers too) are doing the work Americans once did for as much as one half to one third of the wage once paid. Once amnesty is achieved do you really think illegal immigration will suddenly stop? Now that we have several hundred applying for the same job, many legal American workers are complaining that their wages are much lower, and they are not paid overtime anymore ("bosses saying you should have finished in eight hours"). Fear of loosing their job makes them think twice before complaining. We are being whipped into submission as we are considered too "arrogant". One can read more about this at the following link (article by Chuck Baldwin on the goals for the North American Union/ NAFTA): http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=220
You will likely find this article very interesting too: "Fiorina's statement that "there is no job that is America's God-given right anymore" triggered particularly strong reaction. The pair spoke in Washington representing the Computer Systems Policy Project, a group of eight chief executives from the nation's top information technology firms. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/01/09/MNG6C46T0M1.DTL
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Big Government?
Reporting for World Net Daily, author/researcher Jerome Corsi recently reported, "President Obama is continuing President George W. Bush's effort to advance North American integration with a public-relations makeover calculated to place the program under the radar of public opinion and to deflect concerns about border security and national sovereignty.
"The Obama administration has 'rebranded' and 'refocused' the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to advance the Bush administration's agenda of North American integration under the rubric of the "North American Leaders Summit,' a less controversial banner, according to confidential sources in the U.S. Department of Commerce and State Department who agreed to speak with WND only if their comments were kept off the record."
As further evidence of President Obama's determination to continue the Bush policy of a commercial union between countries (or "League of Democracies" as John McCain called it), Corsi also reported, "President Obama has actively backtracked on his campaign promises to renegotiate NAFTA to get provisions more favorable to American workers."
And just as George W. Bush was willing to betray conservatives and Christians in order to achieve global unification, so, too, Barack Obama is willing to betray union workers and America's tradesmen in order to accomplish the same agenda.
read more here: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=220
Recently I listened to a young man who is well educated, and served in the Peace Core...a very fine young man. He believes in a large government to the point of a one world government. He explained to me that is the only way we can solve big issues like polution, global warming and world hunger. Now that we have world banks he feels that we need a world government to monitor them. After all the U.S. has no power over world Banks or international businesses. One needs a one world governing power for that he said.
I don't need to tell you my thoughts on this as I think you already know. But there are those who agree with this young man.
1. David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991?
""We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty if an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries"-- David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
http://www.sodahead.com/sports/david-rockefeller-in-an-address-to-a-trilateral-commission-meeting-in-june-of-1991/question-373019/
_____________________________________________________________________
The IMF and the World BankHow Do They Differ?
If you have difficulty distinguishing the World Bank from the International Monetary Fund, you are not alone. Most people have only the vaguest idea of what these institutions do, and very few people indeed could, if pressed on the point, say why and how they differ. Even John Maynard Keynes, a founding father of the two institutions and considered by many the most brilliant economist of the twentieth century, admitted at the inaugural meeting of the International Monetary Fund that he was confused by the names: he thought the Fund should be called a bank, and the Bank should be called a fund. Confusion has reigned ever since.
read more here:
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/exrp/differ/differ.htm
________________________________________________________________________
They also now have a One World Currency that has recently been issued by the International Monitary Fund. It is called the SDR
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL082809A.htm
_______________________________________________________________________-
For those of you who wish for a big government: Where do we draw the line...I mean how big do you want to get?
"The Obama administration has 'rebranded' and 'refocused' the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to advance the Bush administration's agenda of North American integration under the rubric of the "North American Leaders Summit,' a less controversial banner, according to confidential sources in the U.S. Department of Commerce and State Department who agreed to speak with WND only if their comments were kept off the record."
As further evidence of President Obama's determination to continue the Bush policy of a commercial union between countries (or "League of Democracies" as John McCain called it), Corsi also reported, "President Obama has actively backtracked on his campaign promises to renegotiate NAFTA to get provisions more favorable to American workers."
And just as George W. Bush was willing to betray conservatives and Christians in order to achieve global unification, so, too, Barack Obama is willing to betray union workers and America's tradesmen in order to accomplish the same agenda.
read more here: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=220
Recently I listened to a young man who is well educated, and served in the Peace Core...a very fine young man. He believes in a large government to the point of a one world government. He explained to me that is the only way we can solve big issues like polution, global warming and world hunger. Now that we have world banks he feels that we need a world government to monitor them. After all the U.S. has no power over world Banks or international businesses. One needs a one world governing power for that he said.
I don't need to tell you my thoughts on this as I think you already know. But there are those who agree with this young man.
1. David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991?
""We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty if an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries"-- David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991
http://www.sodahead.com/sports/david-rockefeller-in-an-address-to-a-trilateral-commission-meeting-in-june-of-1991/question-373019/
_____________________________________________________________________
The IMF and the World BankHow Do They Differ?
If you have difficulty distinguishing the World Bank from the International Monetary Fund, you are not alone. Most people have only the vaguest idea of what these institutions do, and very few people indeed could, if pressed on the point, say why and how they differ. Even John Maynard Keynes, a founding father of the two institutions and considered by many the most brilliant economist of the twentieth century, admitted at the inaugural meeting of the International Monetary Fund that he was confused by the names: he thought the Fund should be called a bank, and the Bank should be called a fund. Confusion has reigned ever since.
read more here:
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/exrp/differ/differ.htm
________________________________________________________________________
They also now have a One World Currency that has recently been issued by the International Monitary Fund. It is called the SDR
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/POL082809A.htm
_______________________________________________________________________-
For those of you who wish for a big government: Where do we draw the line...I mean how big do you want to get?
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Solutions Come From Understanding All Perspectives
The plight of farmers looking for workers to pick their crops. (Understanding all perspectives helps evolve solutions)
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/cbreiter2/september-4-2009/conversation-farmer.html?jid=246269&lid=9&rid=2293&tid=814673
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/cbreiter2/september-4-2009/conversation-farmer.html?jid=246269&lid=9&rid=2293&tid=814673
Ted Kennedy's Immigration Legacy
I was dining in downtown Boston with a long-time acquaintance of Teddy Kennedy at the very time the Senator died a week ago. We had discussed what had caused Kennedy to pursue immigration policies that so fundamentally changed America.
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/september-2-2009/ted-kennedys-immigration-legacy-and-why-did-he-do-it.html?jid=246269&lid=9&rid=2278&tid=814673
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/september-2-2009/ted-kennedys-immigration-legacy-and-why-did-he-do-it.html?jid=246269&lid=9&rid=2278&tid=814673
Thursday, September 3, 2009
IMF Issues SDR; World Currency
1. As the largest holder of U.S. debt, China has expressed concern about its investment if the dollar should collapse.
U.S. President Barack Obama said he didn't believe there is a need for a global currency.
On Monday the governor of the People's Bank of China proposed expanded use of an alternative -- the International Monetary Fund's SDR, or Special Drawing Right, an accounting unit based on the euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling and U.S. dollar
For Americans, that could mean higher interest rates for loans of all types, including mortgages and credit cards
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/BUSINESS/03/25/china.currency/
U.S. President Barack Obama said he didn't believe there is a need for a global currency.
On Monday the governor of the People's Bank of China proposed expanded use of an alternative -- the International Monetary Fund's SDR, or Special Drawing Right, an accounting unit based on the euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling and U.S. dollar
For Americans, that could mean higher interest rates for loans of all types, including mortgages and credit cards
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/BUSINESS/03/25/china.currency/
Different Forms of Government Defined
Following is a video explaining the different forms of government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4r0VUybeXY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4r0VUybeXY
Friday, August 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
