Globalization Or Individual Liberty?

Supporters of the "One World Order" (Globalization) are not conspirators. They sincerely believe that we now could face world collapse if we do not have one governing body for the whole world. They argue that we can no longer afford the luxury of individuals and countries doing only what is best for themselves ("protectionism"). They argue we could solve nuclear war threats, world hunger, world pollution, global warming, among other things if we all adhere to one power governing all. Their ideas are sometimes self serving, but more often benevolent.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070513115209AA5b8Sf

http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna44.htm

Constitutionalists and Libertarians argue that the proof is in the podding. the U.S. Founding Fathers studied the most successful governments in history to create the Constitution, and created the most successful form of government the world has ever seen. They further point out that history shows that "Power corrupts, and absolute Power corrupts absolutely".

The more power that is concentrated in the hands of the few, the more corrupt that power becomes. Many use the Chinese Government, Communist Russia, the Federal Reserve, global businesses, and global banks as a perfect example of such corruption resulting from control being placed in the hands of the few.

The last "Harry Potter" book was a very good argument in favor of individual rights when it showed how "one fits all" rules stifle individual creativity . Communist Russia was a living example of the same...showing how it actually creates poverty.

The debate continues as the United States now faces a cross roads as to which direction it will go. I would be very curious to hear your thoughts on this ongoing debate. I guess you know my stance on the subject since I attended the "Tea Party", but I encourage honest debate. Debate with ideas and free of insults is respectful communication.